| Sažetak | Rad se bavi temeljnim konceptima koji čine društvo znanja, polazeći najprije od
doprinosa klasičnih teoretičara društva znanja kao što su: Robert Lane, Fritz Machlup, John
Kenneth Galbraith, Daniel Bell, Peter Drucker, Daniel Bell, Peter Drucker, Alvin Toffler i
Manuel Castells. Rad ovih teoretičara predstavlja temelje društva odnosno ekonomije znanja.
Kod početnih konceptualizacija društva znanja nalazimo određene nejasnoće koje se
razjašnjavaju kroz postavljanja dualiteta društva i ekonomije znanja te obrazlaganja vrijednosnog
konflikta ta dva koncepta. Jednako tako se ovdje ističe relevantnost teorije ljudskog kapitala koja
čini temelj ekonomije znanja a koju analiziramo kroz kritičku perspektivu. Obrađuju se i kritičari
društva znanja gdje Konrad Paul Liessmann predstavlja centralnu ličnost. Ovdje također
nalazimo brojne kritike formirane u obliku kritike neoliberalizma, ekološke kritike te kritika
tehnološkog napretka društva znanja. Inicijalni konflikt društva i ekonomije znanja razrješava
suočavanjem koncepta trostruke sa konceptom peterostruke uzvojnice koji unosi kulturološke i
ekološke elemente taj okvir. Uspostavljanjem teorijskog okvira fokusiramo se na slučaj
hrvatskog društva znanja, njegov postupni razvoj te kroz pregled određenih institucija i
fenomena definiramo stanje hrvatskog društva znanja. Zadnje poglavlje bavi se budućim
perspektivama društva znanja i potencijalnim smjerovima razvoja tehnoloških, znanstvenih i
industrijskih domena. |
| Sažetak (engleski) | The work deals with the fundamental concepts that make up the knowledge society,
starting first with the contributions of classical theorists of the knowledge society such as Robert
Lane, Fritz Machlup, John Kenneth Galbraith, Daniel Bell, Peter Drucker, Alvin Toffler, and
Manuel Castells. The work of these theorists represents the foundations of the knowledge society
or knowledge economy. In the initial conceptualizations of the knowledge society, we find
certain ambiguities that are clarified through the establishment of the duality of the knowledge
society and knowledge economy and the explanation of the value conflict between the two
concepts. The relevance of the human capital theory, which is the foundation of the knowledge
economy, is also emphasized, and it is analyzed through a critical perspective. The critics of the
knowledge society are also discussed, where Konrad Paul Liessmann represents the central
figure. Here, we also find numerous criticisms formed in the form of a critique of neoliberalism,
an ecological critique, and a critique of the technological progress of the knowledge society. The
initial conflict between the knowledge society and the knowledge economy is resolved by facing
the concept of the triple helix with the concept of the quintuple helix, which introduces cultural
and ecological elements into the framework. By establishing a theoretical framework, we focus
on the case of the Croatian knowledge society, its gradual development, and through a review of
certain institutions and phenomena, we define the state of the Croatian knowledge society. The
final chapter deals with the future perspectives of the knowledge society and the potential
directions of development in technological, scientific, and industrial domains. |
