Odnos taktika emocionalne manipulacije s privrženošću, percipiranom partnerovom responzivnošću i zadovoljstvom vezom u ljubavnom odnosu

master's thesis

• Title: Odnos taktika emocionalne manipulacije s privrženošću, percipiranom partnerovom responzivnošću i zadovoljstvom vezom u ljubavnom odnosu : Odnos taktika emocionalne manipulacije s privrženošću, percipiranom partnerovom responzivnošću i zadovoljstvom vezom u ljubavnom odnosu
• Title (english): The association between emotional manipulation tactics, attachment, perceived partner responsiveness and relationship satisfaction in a romantic relationship : The association between emotional manipulation tactics, attachment, perceived partner responsiveness and relationship satisfaction in a romantic relationship
• Author: Iva Groznica
• Mentor: Željka Kamenov (mentor)
• Committee member: Damir Ljubotina (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Darja Maslić Seršić (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences; (Department of Psychology); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2023-06-14, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Psychology; Social Psychology

Abstract

Cilj ovog rada bio je ispitati rodne razlike u korištenju taktika emocionalne manipulacije i njihov odnos s privrženosti (anksioznost, izbjegavanje), percipiranom responzivnosti partnera i zadovoljstvom vezom. Provedeno je online anketno istraživanje na uzorku od 297 muškaraca i 544 žene u dobi od 18 do 40 godina koji se u ljubavnom odnosu nalaze minimalno šest mjeseci. Sudionici su ispunjavali Modificiranu skalu taktika manipulacije (Opat, 2017), Modificirani Inventar iskustava u bliskim vezama (Kamenov i Jelić, 2003), Skalu percipirane responzivnosti partnera (Reis i Carmichael, 2006) te pitanja o sociodemografskim podacima i obilježjima ljubavnih odnosa. Rezultati pokazuju da su žene sklonije korištenju direktnih taktika, a muškarci su skloniji korištenju indirektnih taktika za podilaženje, dok muškarci i žene podjednako koriste indirektne taktike prisile i sve taktike manipulacije općenito. Dobiveno je kako pojedinci visoko na anksioznoj privrženosti više koriste sve tri taktike manipulacije, dok pojedinci visoko na izbjegavajućoj privrženosti više koriste indirektne taktike prisile i podilaženja. Također, pojedinci koji postižu manji rezultat na upitniku percipirane partnerove responzivnosti i izvještavaju o manjem zadovoljstvu vezom u većoj mjeri koristite indirektne taktike prisile i podilaženja, dok nije utvrđena statistički značajna razlika u korištenju direktnih taktika. Hijerarhijska regresijska analiza pokazuje kako rod, dob, duljina trajanja veze, djeca, privrženost (anksioznost, izbjegavanje) i percipirana partnerova responzivnost značajno doprinose objašnjenju varijance svake taktike posebno, dok je zadovoljstvo vezom svoj značajan samostalni doprinos pokazalo jedino u objašnjenju varijance indirektnih taktika prisile.

Abstract (english)

The aim of this paper was to examine gender differences in the use of emotional manipulation tactics and their relationship with attachment (anxiety, avoidance), perceived partner responsiveness and relationship satisfaction. An online survey was conducted on a sample of 297 men and 544 women aged 18 to 40 who have been in a relationship for at least six months. Participants completed the Modified manipulation tactics scale (Opat, 2017), Modified Inventory of Experiences in Close Relationships (Kamenov and Jelić, 2003), Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (Reis and Carmichael, 2006) and questions about sociodemographic data and characteristics of romantic relationships. The results show that women are more inclined to use direct tactics, and men are more inclined to use indirect humuring tactics, while men and women equally use indirect coercion tactics and all manipulation tactics in general. It was found that individuals high on anxious attachment use all three manipulation tactics more, while individuals high on avoidant attachmen use indirect coercion and humuring tactics more. Also, individuals who achieve a lower result on the questionnaire of perceived partner responsiveness and report lower satisfaction with the relationship will use indirect coercion and humuring tactics, while a statistically significant difference with direct tactics was not established. Hierarchical regression analysis shows that gender, age, length of relationship, children, attachment (anxiety, avoidance) and perceived partner's responsiveness significantly contribute to explaining the variance of each tactic separately, while relationship satisfaction is significant showed an independent contribution only in explaining the variance of indirect coercion tactics.

• Keywords: taktike emocionalne manipulacije; privrženost; percipirana partnerova responzivnost; zadovoljstvo vezom
• Keywords (english): emotional manipulation tactics; attachment; perceived partner responsiveness; relationship satisfaction
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:131:010637
• Study programme: Title: Psychology; Study programme type: university; Study level: graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra psihologije (magistar/magistra psihologije)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2023-06-19 09:35:25