Povezanost stilova odlučivanja i osobina ličnosti s nepoželjnim organizacijskim ponašanjem

master's thesis

• Title (english): Relationship between decision-making styles and personality traits with counterproductive work behavior
• Author: Katarina Raos
• Mentor: Maja Parmač Kovačić (mentor)
• Committee member: Damir Ljubotina (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Ena Uzelac (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences; (Department of Psychology); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2022-01-07, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Psychology; Psychology of Work

Abstract

S obzirom na to da su se individualne razlike u odlučivanju pokazale prediktivnima za razne životne ishode, cilj ovog istraživanja bio je ispitati uloge stilova odlučivanja u predviđanju nepoželjnog organizacijskog ponašanja (NOP) povrh osobina ličnosti. Sudionici (N=178) su ispunjavali GDMS upitnik stilova odlučivanja autora Scott i Brucea (1995), Upitnik osobina ličnosti IPIP–20 Donnellana i suradnika (2006) te Upitnik nepoželjnog organizacijskog ponašanja Spectora i suradnika (2010). Rezultati ukazuju na pozitivnu povezanost racionalnog stila i savjesnosti, spontanog stila i ekstraverzije i izbjegavajućeg stila i neuroticizma. Pronađena je negativna povezanost spontanog stila i savjesnosti te izbjegavajućeg stila i ekstraverzije i savjesnosti. Dobiveni nalazi u skladu su s nalazima prijašnjih istraživanja. Nadalje, rezultati o pozitivnoj povezanosti izbjegavajućeg i spontanog stila s NOP–om u skladu su s prijašnjim istraživanjima, dok nalazi o negativnoj povezanosti racionalnog stila i NOP–a nisu dobiveni. Stilovi odlučivanja nisu predviđali NOP povrh osobina ličnosti. U radu su navedena ograničenja istraživanja, kao i preporuke za buduća istraživanja.

Abstract (english)

Considering that individual differences in decision–making are shown as predictive for a variety of real-life outcomes, our goal was to investigate the role of decision–making styles in predicting counterproductive work behavior (CWB) above personality traits. Participants (N=178) have filled up General Decision Making Questionnaire (GDMS) proposed by Scott and Bruce (1995), IPIP–20 questionnaire for measuring Big Five personality traits by Donnellan et al. (2006), and Counterproductive work behavior questionnaire (CWB) by Spector et al. (2010). The results indicate that rational style is positively related to conscientiousness, spontaneous style to extraversion, and avoidant style to neuroticism. It has been found that spontaneous style is negatively related to conscientiousness and avoidant style to extraversion and conscientiousness. These results are in accordance with prior research. Furthermore, the findings of the positive correlation between avoidant and spontaneous style with CWB are consistent with prior research, while the findings of negative correlation between rational style and CWB have not been found. Decision-making styles haven't predicted CWB above personality traits. Study limitations and recommendations for future research are specified in the paper.

• Keywords: stilovi odlučivanja; osobine ličnosti; nepoželjno organizacijsko ponašanje
• Keywords (english): decision-making styles; personality traits; counterproductive work behavior
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:131:879576
• Study programme: Title: Psychology; Study programme type: university; Study level: graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra psihologije (magistar/magistra psihologije)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2022-01-07 14:17:40