Argumentacijska analiza predsjedničkih sučeljavanja na izborima u Francuskoj 2017.

master's thesis

• Author: Tea Šimičić
• Mentor: Gabrijela Kišiček (mentor)
• Committee member: Jelena Vlašić Duić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences; (Department of Phonetics); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2021-02-11, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: HUMANISTIC SCIENCES; Philology; Phonetics

Abstract

Argumentacijska analiza predsjedničkih sučeljavanja na izborima u Francuskoj 2017. Ovaj rad bavi se argumentacijskom analizom televizijskog predsjedničkog sučeljavanja između Marine Le Pen i Emmanuela Macrona koje se održalo prije drugog izbornog kruga 2017. godine. U radu se koristi metoda deskriptivne analize. Kod kandidata su se proučavali preferirani argumentacijski obrasci, argumentacijske pogreške, bonton, odabir riječi i korištenje retoričkih sredstava uvjeravanja, logosa, etosa i... More patosa. Ustanovljeno je da diskurs Marine Le Pen odražava karakteristike populističke ideologije, te da se tijekom debate oslonila prvenstveno na napade na etos, u vidu ad hominem argumenata te na patos, u vidu emotivnih argumenata, dok je argumentacija logosom bila neprimjetna. Ustanovljeno je i da Le Pen često koristi priloge u svrhu kreiranja bliskosti i autoriteta. Emmanuel Macron argumentaciju je usredištio prvenstveno oko logosa, konstrukcije pozitivnog etosa i identifikacije s publikom. Svoju sugovornicu diskreditirao je na temelju nedostatne argumentacije, nepripremljenosti i ideologije koju zastupa Front national. U njegovu diskursu je često prisutna ironija. Radom se ukazuje i na važnost argumentacijske analize i debate za razvoj kritičkog mišljenja. Metodički dio rada sadrži prijedlog i plan za izvođenje nastavnog sata iz predmeta Retorike na temu argumentacije i debate. Less

Abstract (english)

The present thesis is focused on argumentation analysis of French presidential TV debate between Marine Le Pen and Emmanuel Macron that took place in 2017 between the two rounds of the presidential election. The descriptive analysis method is used as a methodological framework. The candidate's performance is analysed by observing argumentation schemes, fallacies, politeness, word choice and presence of persuasive rhetorical devices, logos, ethos and pathos. The results have shown that... More Marine Le Pen's discourse is marked by populism, and that her strategy throughout the debate relied on attacking the opponent’s ethos, by using ad hominem arguments, as much as on pathos, by using the emotive arguments, whereas the argumentation from logos was insignificant. The results have also shown that Le Pen often uses adverbs to build the proximity and authority relation with the audience. Emmanuel Macron’s argumentation was centered primarily on logos, construction of positive ethos, and identification with the audience. He attacked his opponent for insufficient argumentation, poor preparation, and political ideology of National Front. His discourse is often marked with irony. The present work also brings to attention the importance of argumentation analysis and debating for development of critical thinking skills. The thesis also includes a proposal of a class period in the subject of Rhetoric dedicated to argumentation and debate. Less

• Keywords: argumentacija; debata; predsjednička debata; Marine Le Pen; Emmanuel Macron.
• Keywords (english): argumentation; debate; presidential debate; Marine Le Pen; Emmanuel Macron
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:131:197718
• Study programme: Title: Phonetics (double major); specializations in: Clinical Phonetics, Rhetoric, General Phonetics, Rhetoric and General Phonetics; Course: Rhetoric; Study programme type: university; Study level: graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra edukacije govorništva (magistar/magistra edukacije govorništva)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2021-02-18 13:42:37