Deliberativna demokracija i Habermasova teorija komunikacijske racionalnosti: strukturni preduvjeti implementacije

master's thesis

• Author: Luka Lozo
• Mentor: Dragan Bagić (mentor)
• Mentor: Raul Raunić (komentor)
• Committee member: Jasmina Božić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences; (Department of Sociology); Zagreb
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences; (Department of Philosophy); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2020-06-29, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: HUMANISTIC SCIENCES; Philosophy; Political Philosophy
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: SOCIAL SCIENCES; Sociology; Specific Sociologies

Abstract

Deliberativna demokracija od 90-ih godina prošlog stoljeća sve se više nameće kao alternativa postojećem modelu političkog odlučivanja. Zasniva se na ideji da politička odluka zadobiva legitimitet time što je rezultat konsenzusa postignutog kroz slobodnu i ravnopravnu deliberativnu proceduru temeljenu na racionalnom diskursu. U prvom dijelu radu podastire se pregled osnovnih teorijskih postavki, prednosti, nedostataka i prijepora u teoriji deliberativne demokracije. U cilju daljnjeg razvoja deliberativne teorije analizira se rad Jürgena Habermasa, čiji koncepti i analize mogu poslužiti kao resurs za potpunije razumijevanje modernog društva i njegovih patologija, ali i načina na koje je moguće oduprijeti se njegovim destruktivnim tendencijama. Koncept komunikacijske racionalnosti ima ključnu ulogu u Habermasovom emancipacijskom projektu, jer pruža alternativu prevladavajućoj logici koordiniranja djelovanja u društvu temeljenoj na instrumentalnoj racionalnosti. Uvodeći koncept deliberatizacije kao procesa razvijanja deliberativnih ideala u praksi, u završnom djelu rada navode se epistemološki, društveni i institucionalni preduvjeti potrebni za razvoj i implementaciju deliberativnog modela demokracije

Abstract (english)

Deliberative democracy since the early nineties is becoming prominent as a viable alternative to the existing model of political decision-making. It is grounded on the idea that a political decision is upholding its legitimacy from a fact that it is a product of a consensus reached through a free deliberative procedure founded on rational discourse. The first chapter gives an overview of the basic theoretical framework, pros and cons, and current disputes in the field of deliberative democracy. For a purpose of further development of deliberative theory, this paper examines the work of Jürgen Habermas, whose concepts and analysis can be used for a better understanding of modern society and its pathologies, but also as a resource for finding the way to counter its destructive tendencies. Communicative rationality is a key concept in his emancipation project, it provides an alternative to a dominant logic of social action grounded in instrumental rationality. By introducing a concept of deliberatization, as a process of developing deliberative ideals in a society, the last chapter discusses epistemological, social and institutional preconditions for developing and implementing a deliberative model of democracy

• Keywords: deliberativna demokracija; Jürgen Habermas; komunikacijska racionalnost; deliberatizacija
• Keywords (english): deliberative democracy; Jürgen Habermas; communicative rationality; deliberatization
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:131:989362
• Study programme: Title: Sociology (double major); specializations in: Research, Teaching; Course: Teaching; Study programme type: university; Study level: graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra edukacije sociologije (magistar/magistra edukacije sociologije)
• Study programme: Title: Philosophy (double major); specializations in: Teaching, Research; Course: Teaching; Study programme type: university; Study level: graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra edukacije filozofije (magistar/magistra edukacije filozofije)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2020-07-03 00:53:25