Rancièreovo poimanje nesuglasnosti nasuprot teorije deliberativne demokracije

master's thesis

• Title (english): Rancière's understanding of disagreement versus the theory of deliberative democracy
• Author: Ivan Šanjug
• Mentor: Goran Sunajko (mentor)
• Committee member: Lino Veljak (predsjednik povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Luka Bogdanić (član povjerenstva)
• Committee member: Goran Sunajko (član povjerenstva)
• Granter: University of Zagreb; Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences; (Department of Philosophy); Zagreb
• Defense date and country: 2020-06-10, Croatia
• Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline: HUMANISTIC SCIENCES; Philosophy

Abstract

Rad preispituje teoriju deliberativne demokracije na temelju Rancièreovog poimanja „nesuglasnosti“. Predstavljena su dva dominantna pravca teorije deliberativne demokracije - onaj Johna Rawlsa te onaj Jürgena Habermasa. Nasuprot teoriji deliberativne demokracije, Rancière tumači demokraciju kao pojavnost u sporu koji nastaje podizanjem zahtjeva za jednakošću od onih koji su dio zajednice, ali bez udjela u moći ili jednakim pravima. S njegovom teorijom otvara se prostor za preispitivanje dominacije deliberativne demokracije u trenutnim raspravama o demokraciji. Ispituje se mogućnost racionalnog promišljanja kao osnove demokracije u društvu sa složenim i ukorijenjenim nejednakostima te se suprotstavlja važnost konsenzusa naspram nesuglasnosti.

Abstract (english)

This paper re-examines the theory of deliberative democracy based on Rancière's notion of "disagreement". Two dominant directions of the theory of deliberative democracy are presented - that of John Rawls and that of Jürgen Habermas. Contrary to the theory of deliberative democracy, Rancière interprets democracy as a phenomenon in a dispute that arises from the raising of demands for equality by those who are part of the community, but without a share in power or equal rights. With his theory, space opens up for re-examining the dominance of deliberative democracy in current debates about democracy. The possibility of rational thinking as the basis of democracy in a society with complex and ingrained inequalities is examined, and the importance of consensus versus disagreement is opposed.

• Keywords: deliberativna demokracija; konsenzus; nesuglasnost; Jacques Rancière
• Keywords (english): deliberative democracy; consensus; disagreement; Jacques Rancière
• Language: croatian
• URN:NBN: urn:nbn:hr:131:417703
• Study programme: Title: Philosophy (double major); specializations in: Teaching, Research; Course: Research; Study programme type: university; Study level: graduate; Academic / professional title: magistar/magistra filozofije (magistar/magistra filozofije)
• Type of resource: Text
• File origin: Born digital
• Access conditions: Open access
• Created on: 2020-06-14 19:18:39